Wednesday, October 15, 2008

"Half a Loaf" Article



Our article: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810/bread (enjoy! The article is 2 painless pages, by the way.)

Summary:

The issue and controversy of recipe copyrights have always been a problem for chefs and bakers. The central problem to recipe copyrights is that recipes are often “shared” without notification to the people who published/posted the recipe originally -- and there is practically no way to know who created what. The advent of Internet only made things worse, as websites dedicated to recipes constantly included published work without any attribution to the cookbook writers. Before Internet, cookbook writers can demand credit; however, blogs and advertising sites proved hard to prosecute – since they can easily go by the rules of fair use. Bakers also copy others’ celebrated and popular recipes under the disguise of sharing ideas. Patenting is frowned upon, and bakers who create original recipes are left to deal with the problem themselves – while there is no solution to prevent copying. Recently, the split of Sullivan St breads had led to two different brands that sell identical breads and cookies. Jim Lahey and Monica Von Thun Calderón both took the recipes and started producing on their own. The company Sullivan St split into two businesses, and forced customers to pick one to favor: a hard decision since both sides featured very similar products. However, being two separate lines, one had to change the name of their products, which brings back the copyright issue. It is easy to trademark unknown and fake words (such as "frappuccino"), but not as easy for common words. Copyrights like food recipes and methods are hard to keep track of, especially with the spread of the internet. Some like Lahey are not so over-reactive about property rights though. He came up with a revolutionary baking method, and when he found it in a prominent cook's recipe book, he did not complain. He says that the recipe was an ancient method, so to copyright it would be "absurd." Instead, he encourages bakers to cooperate to win back the prosperity of their industry. The "'craft bread' market" has diminished since industrial producers started selling "'artisanal' bread," and flour prices have tripled. Lahey proposes to gather bakers in a Craft Baker's Association, stating "In unity there is strength."

Discussion Questions

1. Do you think Lahey’s idea of the Craft Bakers’ Association is a good idea? Do you think it could work successfully or fuel another squabble between bakers?

2. In your opinion, is it fair or unfair that bakers have a harder time “self-branding” and obtaining a name of recognition” than restaurant owners do? Why?

3. Do you think that copyrighting recipes will put an end to the imitations of recipes? (most of you may say yes, but look at how the famous baker found a loop hole and published Kummer’s recipe in her book)

Group Reactions to “Half a Loaf”
The catchy, unusual subject matter and creative title of this piece were what drew us in to picking this article. Our group’s reaction to these was initially one of humor: Copyrighting bread recipes? How ridiculous does that sound? However, after reading into the article, our group became interested and perhaps even a bit engrossed in arguing whether or not recipes should be “patented.” We were surprised that a recipe for something as wholesome and good as bread (everyone loves carbs!) could cause such confrontation amongst individuals. The rival bakeries discussed in this article display the gravity of these recipe wars.

Our group laughed at the idea that people could get torn apart by food. After all, food is supposed to bring people together.

Yet this recipe controversy can cause a lot more tension than just on a local level:

One member of our group recalled listening to an NPR report a few days ago in which the commentator discussed how the origin of hummus (another one of everyone’s favorite food) has been disputed throughout history. Lebanese, Palestinians, and Israelis all claim to have originally created the dish. This controversy only adds onto the tension that already exists in the Middle East.

<---hummus: everyone's favorite dip, stirring up controversy??

Our group agreed that credit for new recipes should be awarded to chefs in some form, whether in a database for new records (much like the patent office for new inventions) or by the copyright office itself. Chefs, much like artists or authors, take pride in their work. Just honoring the chefs for their recipes would be a great stride in this field. Although it would be extremely difficult to track down “copyright infringers,” chefs must somehow receive credit and/or praise for their culinary creations….after all, they are “inventors” themselves.

"Half a Loaf" Discussion Questions

1. Do you think Lahey’s idea of the Craft Bakers’ Association is a good idea? Do you think it could work successfully or fuel another squabble between bakers?
2. In your opinion, is it fair or unfair that bakers have a harder time “self-branding” and obtaining a name of recognition” than restaurant owners do? Why?
3. Do you think that copyrighting recipes will put an end to the imitations of recipes? (most of you may say yes, but look at how the famous baker found a loop hole and published Kummer’s recipe in her book)

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Group Reaction to "The Wars of John McCain"

After reading the article, "The Wars of John McCain," our group had mixed reactions. It first brought into question whether John McCain's goal for victory a reflection of an antiquated pre-Vietnam mind-set. Is John McCain preoccupied and obsessing for victory based on the results of the Vietnam War, or is he committing to a set of principles that we forsake when all hope is lost? We were also wondering that if McCain's "quest" for victory really is a reflection of his Vietnam War mind-set, is this the mind-set of a leader or of his self-satisfying needs. We all understood that McCain does not want to "lose" the war. He even made a profound "McCain-like" statement that was in a way grandstanding: "I'd rather lose an election than lose a war." McCain stated that "he understood the profoundness of losing the war" and that only a person with his "life experiences could understand that." Overall, the article piqued our interest as to the "real" mindset of a presidential candidate: one who commits to principles or one who is caught in the past.
Discussion Questions

1) Do you support Senator McCain's belief that "war can solve the unsolved problems" ? Why or why not?

2) McCain was a POW in Vietnam. How - in your opinion - did this effect his perspective on ways to deal with international problems?

3) How do you think Obama views McCain's "war" belief?
*This question is somewhat unrelated, but its nearing election day, so I might as well ask it!*

Summary

Senator McCain was a prisoner of war in the Vietnam war, and served in World War II. His father was a high ranked Admiral, and while he was a POW (prisoner of war), he was offered an early release, because of his father's high rank. He blantantly refused, displaying heroics. However, his experience with war has clouded is opinion, according to Jeffrey Goldberg. McCain believes that "War will solve the unsolved problems", and that includes the fact that he belived we could win the war in Vietname purely based of military power. His "military" beliefs lean towards facism, but he always goes back to his Republican Orthodoxy and conform. He also believed that the war in Iraq could have been solved purely through military power. McCain end on the note of being uncomfortable with the topic of preemption: "It's very hard to run for president on this idea right now."

The Wars of John McCain

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810/mccain

this aricle has more than one page, just letting you all know before you read it.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Group Reactions for "The Chilling Innocence of Piracy"

After reading the article, "The Chilling Innocence of Piracy" our group had several different reactions. We were shocked at how involved the United States is in this issue. We also thought it was ridiculous that 61 ships have been attacked by pirates. We were suprised at how prepared the pirates are and at how well they plan their attacks. They have drinking water and gasoline and many other necessary supplies. They even carry their own lines and nets to catch fish and eat them raw. Overall, we were very interested to find that as much damage as piracy does, it can be found to have positive aspects like bringing nations together and helping them to form new alliances.

Discussion Questions for "The Chilling Innocence of Piracy"

1. What do you think the governments in these regions should do to alleviate or possibly eliminate the serious situation of Indian Ocean piracy? How should they work together?


2. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of international cooperation? Can even more problems occur from this alliance?


3. How do you think 21th century technology has impacted this “New Age” piracy?

Link to This Week's Article

http://thecurrent.theatlantic.com/

The Chilling Innocence of Piracy - Summary

The article discusses the problem of piracy in Somalia. It describes how recent issues in the area have given rise to anarchy and piracy. The Somali civil war of the 1990s left the country with little government, which allowed piracy to flourish. It has escalated and there have been 61 attacks in the last year, all with costly ransoms. These pirates treat their victims very poorly; there are reports of beatings, bullying, and starvation for the crews that were on the captured ship. The article argues that there may be an upside to piracy in that it forces local countries to cooperate, and sheds international light on a highly impoverished nation.